Sophia researchers find that not expecting a gift or counterfactually imagining not receiving a gift does not really improve a beneficiary’s level of gratitude on receiving a gift

Researchers from Japan find that not expecting a gift or counterfactually imagining not receiving a gift does not really improve a beneficiary’s level of gratitude on receiving a gift

Gratitude is a strong emotion that can enhance bonding between two parties. It is often believed that a surprise gift can enhance a beneficiary’s feeling of gratitude, especially when the beneficiary did not expect it. However, in a new study, researchers from Japan show that when an absence of benefits/gifts was simulated for beneficiaries before or after they received the benefits, there was no increase in their gratitude.

Gratitude is a strong emotion, usually felt by a person who benefits from an intentional good deed of another person. Receiving gifts or benefits can instill a feeling of gratitude in people who receive them, i.e., beneficiaries, encouraging them to be more prosocial, while also helping to create a bond with their benefactors. This has led several researchers to examine the determinants of gratitude. Interestingly, beneficiaries often have preconceived beliefs about receiving a benefit. For instance, they may have no prior expectations of receiving a ‘surprise’ gift or could counterfactually imagine the absence of those benefits, despite receiving them. Although several studies have investigated the connection between expectations or counterfactual thinking and gratitude, there is insufficient information on whether imagining the absence of benefits increases beneficiaries’ gratitude upon receiving them.

To this end, a study published in Japanese Psychological Research on 07 July 2023 investigated whether simulating the absence of benefits increases beneficiaries’ gratitude, via two psychological experiments. “Study 1 examined the effect of prior expectation of not receiving benefits, and Study 2 examined the effect of posterior counterfactual thinking regarding the benefits, with the hypothesis that simulating the absence of benefits increases gratitude in both studies,” explains lead author Dr. Akitomo Yamamoto, a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Faculty of Human Sciences, Sophia University. “These studies are part of a continuous investigation into whether gratitude, which is an emotional response to others’ benevolence, can be influenced by factors unrelated to the nature of the benevolence itself,” he continues.

In both studies Dr. Yamamoto and his co-author Masataka Higuchi, also from Sophia University, provided participants with manipulated vignettes to read as part of the simulations. While some participants received vignettes with absence simulations (absence simulation group), others received vignettes without absence simulations (control group). All participants were social psychology students at a Japanese university.

In the first study, participants were presented with a scenario where a beneficiary (the participants themselves) may receive a gift from a benefactor. The absence simulation group is then informed that the benefactor did not prepare a gift—ergo setting no prior expectation of receiving a benefit. In contrast, the control group was informed that the benefactor did seem to prepare a certain gift. In the final vignette, both groups were told that the beneficiary receives the gift. Subsequently, the participants were asked to rate their gratitude on a nine-point unipolar scale (0-8).

In the second study, the participants read a vignette where a beneficiary (the participants themselves) received a certain benefit from a benefactor. The absence simulation group was then asked to imagine not receiving the benefit and the control group was asked to again imagine the benefit-receiving event. Both groups were asked to note down the consequences of their respective simulations and rate their gratitude.

Interestingly, the research team found that in both studies, simulating the absence of benefits did not significantly increase the participants’ gratitude as compared to the respective control groups. This negates the researchers’ original hypothesis and instead suggests that simulating the absence of benefits does not increase the beneficiaries’ feeling of gratitude.

These findings can help enhance our understanding of gratitude and how beneficiaries’ beliefs may or may not control this emotion. They could also have implications for the practice of gift-giving. “Our findings suggest that infusing your gifts with genuine thoughtfulness for the recipient, rather than focusing on peripheral elements like making it a surprise, is essential to make the recipient feel grateful,” concludes Dr. Yamamoto.


  • Title of original paper: The Effect of Simulating the Absence of Benefits on Gratitude: Prior Expectations and Posterior Counterfactual Thinking
  • Journal: Japanese Psychological Research
  • DOI: 10.1111/jpr.12463
  • Authors: Akitomo Yamamoto, Masataka Higuchi
  • Affiliations: Sophia University

About Dr. Akitomo Yamamoto from Sophia University

Dr. Akitomo Yamamoto is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Sophia University’s Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Psychology. He has over 8 years of research experience, and has published 10 scientific articles in the field of social psychology. His academic interests include social emotion, gratitude, and indebtedness. Dr. Yamamoto received his PhD from Sophia University’s Graduate School of Human Sciences. Apart from his position at Sophia University, Dr. Yamamoto is also employed as a part-time lecturer at Bunkyo University and Toyo University.

Funding information


Expert contact

Dr. Akitomo Yamamoto, Postdoctoral fellow at Department of Psychology

Media contact

Office of Public Relations, Sophia University

  • HOME

  • Articles

  • News

  • Press Release

Sophia University

For Others, With Others